Nikon Coolpix S225 vs. Nikon Coolpix S220

Comparison

change cameras »

Nikon Coolpix S225

Nikon Coolpix S220

check price »

Megapixels

10.34

10.00

Max. image resolution

3648 x 2736

Sensor

Sensor type

CCD

Sensor size

1/2.33" (~ 6.08 x 4.56 mm)

Sensor resolution

3708 x 2788

3647 x 2742

Diagonal

7.60 mm

Sensor size comparison

Sensor size is generally a good indicator of the quality of the camera. Sensors can vary greatly in size. As a general rule, the bigger the sensor, the better the image quality.

Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.

Learn more about sensor sizes »

Actual sensor size

Note: Actual size is set to screen → change »

	vs
1	:	1
(ratio)

Nikon Coolpix S225		Nikon Coolpix S220

Surface area:

27.72 mm²

Difference: 0 mm² (0%)

S225 and S220 sensors are the same size.

Pixel pitch

1.64 µm

1.67 µm

Pixel pitch tells you the distance from the center of one pixel (photosite) to the center of the next. It tells you how close the pixels are to each other.

The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.

Difference: 0.03 µm (2%)

Pixel pitch of S220 is approx. 2% higher than pixel pitch of S225.

Pixel area

2.69 µm²

2.79 µm²

Pixel or photosite area affects how much light per pixel can be gathered. The larger it is the more light can be collected by a single pixel.

Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.

Relative pixel sizes:

Pixel area difference: 0.1 µm² (4%)

A pixel on Nikon S220 sensor is approx. 4% bigger than a pixel on Nikon S225.

Pixel density

37.19 MP/cm²

35.98 MP/cm²

Pixel density tells you how many million pixels fit or would fit in one square cm of the sensor.

Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.

Difference: 1.21 µm (3%)

Nikon S225 has approx. 3% higher pixel density than Nikon S220.

To learn about the accuracy of these numbers, click here.

Specs

Nikon S225

Nikon S220

Crop factor

5.69

Total megapixels

10.70

Effective megapixels

10.00

Optical zoom

Yes

Digital zoom

Yes

ISO sensitivity

Auto

Auto, 80, 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, 2000

RAW

Manual focus

Normal focus range

60 cm

Macro focus range

10 cm

Focal length (35mm equiv.)

35 - 105 mm

Aperture priority

Max. aperture

f3.1 - f5.9

Max. aperture (35mm equiv.)

f17.6 - f33.6

Metering

Centre weighted

Exposure compensation

±2 EV (in 1/3 EV steps)

Shutter priority

Min. shutter speed

8 sec

Max. shutter speed

1/2000 sec

Built-in flash

External flash

Viewfinder

None

White balance presets

Screen size

2.5"

2,5"

Screen resolution

150,000 dots

Video capture

Max. video resolution

Storage types

SDHC, Secure Digital

USB

USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)

HDMI

Wireless

GPS

Battery

Nikon EN-EL10 Lithium-ion Battery

Weight

100 g

Dimensions

89.5 x 55.5 x 18 mm

Year

2009

Choose cameras to compare

Popular comparisons:

Diagonal

Diagonal is calculated by the use of Pythagorean theorem:

Diagonal = √

w² + h²

where w = sensor width and h = sensor height

Nikon S225 diagonal

The diagonal of S225 sensor is not 1/2.33 or 0.43" (10.9 mm) as you might expect, but approximately two thirds of that value - 7.6 mm. If you want to know why, see sensor sizes.

w = 6.08 mm
h = 4.56 mm

Diagonal = √

6.08² + 4.56²

= 7.60 mm

Nikon S220 diagonal

The diagonal of S220 sensor is not 1/2.33 or 0.43" (10.9 mm) as you might expect, but approximately two thirds of that value - 7.6 mm. If you want to know why, see sensor sizes.

w = 6.08 mm
h = 4.56 mm

Diagonal = √

6.08² + 4.56²

= 7.60 mm

Surface area

Surface area is calculated by multiplying the width and the height of a sensor.

S225 sensor area

Width = 6.08 mm
Height = 4.56 mm

Surface area = 6.08 × 4.56 = 27.72 mm²

S220 sensor area

Width = 6.08 mm
Height = 4.56 mm

Surface area = 6.08 × 4.56 = 27.72 mm²

Pixel pitch

Pixel pitch is the distance from the center of one pixel to the center of the next measured in micrometers (µm). It can be calculated with the following formula:

Pixel pitch =	sensor width in mm	× 1000
	sensor resolution width in pixels

S225 pixel pitch

Sensor width = 6.08 mm
Sensor resolution width = 3708 pixels

Pixel pitch =	6.08	× 1000	= 1.64 µm
	3708

S220 pixel pitch

Sensor width = 6.08 mm
Sensor resolution width = 3647 pixels

Pixel pitch =	6.08	× 1000	= 1.67 µm
	3647

Pixel area

The area of one pixel can be calculated by simply squaring the pixel pitch:

Pixel area = pixel pitch²

You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:

Pixel area =	sensor surface area in mm²
	effective megapixels

S225 pixel area

Pixel pitch = 1.64 µm

Pixel area = 1.64² = 2.69 µm²

S220 pixel area

Pixel pitch = 1.67 µm

Pixel area = 1.67² = 2.79 µm²

Pixel density

Pixel density can be calculated with the following formula:

Pixel density = (	sensor resolution width in pixels	)² / 1000000
	sensor width in cm

One could also use this formula:

Pixel density =	effective megapixels × 1000000	/ 10000
	sensor surface area in mm²

S225 pixel density

Sensor resolution width = 3708 pixels
Sensor width = 0.608 cm

Pixel density = (3708 / 0.608)² / 1000000 = 37.19 MP/cm²

S220 pixel density

Sensor resolution width = 3647 pixels
Sensor width = 0.608 cm

Pixel density = (3647 / 0.608)² / 1000000 = 35.98 MP/cm²

Sensor resolution

Sensor resolution is calculated from sensor size and effective megapixels. It's slightly higher than maximum (not interpolated) image resolution which is usually stated on camera specifications. Sensor resolution is used in pixel pitch, pixel area, and pixel density formula. For sake of simplicity, we're going to calculate it in 3 stages.

1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.

2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:

(X × r) × X = effective megapixels × 1000000 →

X = √	effective megapixels × 1000000
	r

3. To get sensor resolution we then multiply X with the corresponding ratio:

Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X

S225 sensor resolution

Sensor width = 6.08 mm
Sensor height = 4.56 mm
Effective megapixels = 10.34

r = 6.08/4.56 = 1.33

X = √	10.34 × 1000000	= 2788
	1.33

Resolution horizontal: X × r = 2788 × 1.33 = 3708
Resolution vertical: X = 2788

Sensor resolution = 3708 x 2788

S220 sensor resolution

Sensor width = 6.08 mm
Sensor height = 4.56 mm
Effective megapixels = 10.00

r = 6.08/4.56 = 1.33

X = √	10.00 × 1000000	= 2742
	1.33

Resolution horizontal: X × r = 2742 × 1.33 = 3647
Resolution vertical: X = 2742

Sensor resolution = 3647 x 2742

Crop factor

Crop factor or focal length multiplier is calculated by dividing the diagonal of 35 mm film (43.27 mm) with the diagonal of the sensor.

Crop factor =	43.27 mm
	sensor diagonal in mm

S225 crop factor

Sensor diagonal in mm = 7.60 mm

Crop factor =	43.27	= 5.69
	7.60

S220 crop factor

Sensor diagonal in mm = 7.60 mm

Crop factor =	43.27	= 5.69
	7.60

35 mm equivalent aperture

Equivalent aperture (in 135 film terms) is calculated by multiplying lens aperture with crop factor (a.k.a. focal length multiplier).

S225 equivalent aperture

Crop factor = 5.69
Aperture = f3.1 - f5.9

35-mm equivalent aperture = (f3.1 - f5.9) × 5.69 = f17.6 - f33.6

S220 equivalent aperture

Crop factor = 5.69
Aperture = f3.1 - f5.9

35-mm equivalent aperture = (f3.1 - f5.9) × 5.69 = f17.6 - f33.6

Enter your screen size (diagonal)

My screen size is inches

Actual size is currently adjusted to screen.

If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.